Appellate Division, Fourth Department · July 24, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 04573
People v Wright
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 04573
Holding The court reversed the conviction and granted a new trial because the trial court erroneously admitted privileged medical testimony under the Tarasoff exception, which does not permit disclosure of confidential information at trial after the exigent circumstances have ended. The court found the error was not harmless because the evidence of guilt was not overwhelming, particularly given the prior mistrial.
The court’s words
The Tarasoff exception authorized the treating physician and nurse to disclose privileged information about defendant to the police because a baby's life may have been in jeopardy and time was of the essence.
2026 NY Slip Op 04573, at the official text
The exception did not, however, authorize the physician and nurse to testify at trial some four years later about the privileged information.
2026 NY Slip Op 04573, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | July 24, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 04573 |
| Area of law | Criminal Law |
| Week | Week ending July 25, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 04573 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 279 |
| Related records | People v Wright, 2026 NY Slip Op 06216; People v Wright, 2026 NY Slip Op 05689; People v Wright, 2026 NY Slip Op 04580 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, People v Wright, 2026 NY Slip Op 04573 (Appellate Division, Fourth Department, July 24, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-04573/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works