ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Fourth Department · July 24, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 04573

People v Wright

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 04573

Holding The court reversed the conviction and granted a new trial because the trial court erroneously admitted privileged medical testimony under the Tarasoff exception, which does not permit disclosure of confidential information at trial after the exigent circumstances have ended. The court found the error was not harmless because the evidence of guilt was not overwhelming, particularly given the prior mistrial.

The court’s words

The Tarasoff exception authorized the treating physician and nurse to disclose privileged information about defendant to the police because a baby's life may have been in jeopardy and time was of the essence.

2026 NY Slip Op 04573, at the official text

The exception did not, however, authorize the physician and nurse to testify at trial some four years later about the privileged information.

2026 NY Slip Op 04573, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Fourth Department
DecidedJuly 24, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 04573
Area of lawCriminal Law
WeekWeek ending July 25, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 04573
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id279
Related recordsPeople v Wright, 2026 NY Slip Op 06216; People v Wright, 2026 NY Slip Op 05689; People v Wright, 2026 NY Slip Op 04580

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, People v Wright, 2026 NY Slip Op 04573 (Appellate Division, Fourth Department, July 24, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-04573/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published July 24, 2026. Updated November 14, 2026.